It has been a busy time in the news media with topics as the Virgina school shooting, the recorded message from Alex Baldwin, Rosie O'Donnel departure from the View(poor Rosie) and the Democrates spending so much time and energy on a bill just so the President can veto due to the time table. I have a few words to say about Harry Reid(who does not speak for me) but his plan involves in cutting and running. Did you know his nick name growing up was "Pinky"? Harry must have been picked on alot due to that name and probally avoiding bullies by running away. Sorry Harry, this is war, and Americans will not be intiminated by fear from any country and any group just because they blow themselves up. Every time a memeber of their group decieds to be a Roman candle on Acid, it is evidence that we are winning. That is all they got. They can not fight against our highly training Army so they are reduced to a bunch of little kids sneaking out of their parents house to egg someone's house or in recent times, go on a killing spree.
At least Alex is apologizing over his voice mail, but Harry Reid has said nothing about his statement about announcing to the American people that the war is lost. What signals the war is lost? What objectives were not met? Are people worst off now by having their freedom, which Harry and others have to vote and make their voice know which during Saddam was not possible unless you wanted to die. Then another Senator has to explain what Harry really means that another direction is need in the war. NO- he said the war was LOST. So if we lost the war, then who won? Did the terrorist that flew airplanes in the World Trade Center win? Should people quite because things are getting tough or not looking good. They are saying that the President’s policy is a failure, why because the terrorist are blowing themselves up? His policy was to protect our country from another terrorist attack and that he has done? This is the same man that opposes semi-automatic weapons (that is a good thing) but is for the death penalty. That explains why inmates are injected with lethal drugs to kill them to be humane. Did Scott Peterson act humanely when he killed his wife and unborn baby and dump them in a body of water? Take an automatic weapon with the person being blindfolded and the deal is done.
Since Harry Reid is against such weapons and is far pulling our first line of defense out of Iraq, I guess his plan is to fight the enemies with pistols and possible knives. Well, we will just call in some ninjas and settle it that way.
Congress has said the President gave them misleading information about Iraq, well, that is the same information that he received from the CIA and all the others that supply intelligence. Democrats have shown that they are weak leaders that do not stand up for the American way and for concrete principals. The President has not wavered during the war or his decling approval ratings, but Congress is influenced by those that contribute the most amount of money to their campaigns. That is all for now. And this is my opinion.
Friday, April 27, 2007
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Civil Rights Leaders?Not!
Ever since Don Imus made his slip, everyone has been bashing him and ended up firing him from his show. What he did may have been wrong, but does the punishment fit the crime. And it is interesting that the Lacrosse players were found innocent of raping a black women and not one Civil rights leader has said any apolyizes to the three men after they already deemed them gulity in their own eyes. In this country are assumed innocent until proven guilty. Unless you have all the evidence, no one is fit to make a decsion, this was just a race card. A black women said the three whites men raped her, gee it must be true, even if she is a stripper and has a history of false testimoney. The three men suffered for over a year, but where are the civil right's leader in this case. The truth be told, the civil rights leaders are biase towards black and not just Americans. Their true titles should be Black Civil Rights leader or African-American Civil Rights leader. They only care about the issues that affect their race otherwise they would have publicly aploygize for their condem words almost a year ago. But they are too busy with Don Imus, a 60 something old white man that does comic news reporting. If you are going to defend one races civil rights, then defend all races civil rights otherwise you are a hypricrite for standing up for the black community and not the other communities. This is what you would call favortism, bias and just plan ignorant. A leader does not just guide some people who are in need, the guide all, they influence and motivate people to do the right thing. My opinon has been spoken.
Tuesday, April 10, 2007
Hot Issues
What is your opinion on the Don IMUS issue? Was he wrong? Is everyone over-reacting? What's your opinion?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
